videogameman Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Heh poor darkseid Wrong. Dethroning Moment of Suck. Batman does not kill. Ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KevinDWolf93 Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Wrong. Dethroning Moment of Suck. Batman does not kill. Ever. First off, I meant the fact he stood tall against darkseid a powerful being. And threatened him with a gun which may or may not have worked. Secondly: Batman does not kill...ever?...OOHHH BOY where to start. And thats a tame one, for when he was softened. Dont question the canon of it. Its an official story. heres an official kill count before having a no-kill policy enforced by writers. Its fairly high given the amount of time.. In fact before some slight character change, he actually carried around a gun for about a year in storywise from the original 30's stories. So never say never, Though I may admit I shouldve put more context, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest boston_celtics Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Wrong. Dethroning Moment of Suck. Batman does not kill. Ever. "Cough" Cough " Cough" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treacherous Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Question:Who would be crazy enough to attack Darth Vader, probably the best lightsaber duelist at the time, with a lightsaber and not even be a force user? General Grievous? Tee hee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KevinDWolf93 Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 General Grievous? Tee hee. You mean General Grievous:The master of "exit stage left?". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 You mean General Grievous:The master of "exit stage left?". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treacherous Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Everybody knows that Grievous was the man before But come on, that's Mace Windu we're talking about. Who wouldn't have been pwned. Both Anakin and Obi Wan would've been pwned by him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KevinDWolf93 Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Yes, unfortunately he doesnt make a habit of that as much as ud think. He is still characterized as a coward and has shown in the EU to be better at the cut and run vs cut and slash. PS: I meant had no training with a saber, grievous was trained by COUNT FRIGGIN DOOKU!!! Boba was just that crazy awesome! PPS:Incidentially that vid counts as a CmoA so way to stay on topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landon Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Grievous is awesome BECAUSE he runs away. In a world where every major character is a stand and fight type (even frickin' Jar Jar gets out there and shoots at stuff), Grievous is the lone significant character that likes to cut his losses and run away when it's the smart thing to do. He may be the coolest thing to come out of the mostly-crappy prequels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treacherous Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 A good leader knows when to retreat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dark Ranger X Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 A good leader knows when to tactically withdraw. Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treacherous Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Right. History is written by the victor and the victor will write that he tactically withdrew. This is why Shaka Zulu (CBUB database for those who don't know him) once said that you never let a snake live, because it will rise again to strike you down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 PS: I meant had no training with a saber, grievous was trained by COUNT FRIGGIN DOOKU!!! Boba was just that crazy awesome! In that pic, Boba says he has killed Jedi before so he's probably trained with it. Besides, its basically a sword(albeit one that can cut through most everything), which isn't hard to learn to use effectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest boston_celtics Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 In that pic, Boba says he has killed Jedi before so he's probably trained with it. Besides, its basically a sword(albeit one that can cut through most everything), which isn't hard to learn to use effectively. Dead wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Dead wrong. Really? It said it was based on sword fighting. Anyway, I wasn't referring to mastering it. I was referring to basic skill(I.E. knowing how to use it without stabbing yourself.) Here's what part of the article said- Lightsaber combat was the preferred method of fighting used by the Jedi and Sith, which was initially based on ancient sword-fighting techniques. All seven traditional lightsaber forms included the same basic techniques as ancient sword-fighting styles, such as defensive postures, overhand strikes, parries, and counterstrikes. Plus, Non force users could use it effectively.(Grievous, Proxy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest boston_celtics Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Really? It said it was based on sword fighting. Anyway, I wasn't referring to mastering it. I was referring to basic skill(I.E. knowing how to use it without stabbing yourself.) Here's what part of the article said- Lightsaber combat was the preferred method of fighting used by the Jedi and Sith, which was initially based on ancient sword-fighting techniques. All seven traditional lightsaber forms included the same basic techniques as ancient sword-fighting styles, such as defensive postures, overhand strikes, parries, and counterstrikes. Plus, Non force users could use it effectively.(Grievous, Proxy) Grievous was a cyborg, and Proxy was designed to lightsaber duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Grievous was a cyborg, and Proxy was designed to lightsaber duel. You got a point there, but still, I mean how did Starkiller learn much of his skill in using lightsabers? By dueling Vader and Proxy. And according to the pic Kevin posted, Boba has done that with other jedi. However, Galen was force sensitive so maybe I'm pushing it. All right, you win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KevinDWolf93 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 You got a point there, but still, I mean how did Starkiller learn much of his skill in using lightsabers? By dueling Vader and Proxy. And according to the pic Kevin posted, Boba has done that with other jedi. However, Galen was force sensitive so maybe I'm pushing it. All right, you win. No. What the pic said was that Boba had killed a jedi. He didnt say he killed him with a lightsaber, in fact its implied that lightsaber belongs to the jedi he mentioned killing...he was probably carrying it as a souvenier instead of a weapon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 No. What the pic said was that Boba had killed a jedi. He didnt say he killed him with a lightsaber, in fact its implied that lightsaber belongs to the jedi he mentioned killing...he was probably carrying it as a souvenier instead of a weapon. And if you had a weapon like that, you wouldn't try using it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KevinDWolf93 Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 And if you had a weapon like that, you wouldn't try using it? Hells yes, but Im not Boba Fett. He was perfectly capable of fighting off force users without it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KevinDWolf93 Posted January 2, 2010 Share Posted January 2, 2010 I match your Aunt May and raise you a Ma Kent...with an assist from Krypto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treacherous Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I don't know about Ma Kent, but the dog is badass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KevinDWolf93 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I don't know about Ma Kent, but the dog is badass. If you were jumped by a superpowered corpse of a loved one who was trying to kill you, what would your reaction be? No offense but I don think: "burn the sh*t out of it then sick your dog on it" would be the first thing on your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ribbonz Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 If anyone wants to read an intire book devoted to this thread than read Punisher:Welcome Back Frank. It was a good book but the way Frank kills the dude's is so ridiculous that it is awesome, E.G he smother The Russian (An uber killing machine) with Frank's obese neighbour, or when he punches a polar bear in the face to make it eat Ma, Ha ha brilliant..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvel Man Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 I miss this thread. So I will give it life! Dr. Strange unloads on some poor fool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now